W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > October 2004

Re: Monday (18 October) QA WG telecon Agenda

From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:04:23 -0400
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20041018080326.01d0eff0@wsxg03.nist.gov>
To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
may be a few minutes late.

I have reviewed all of SpecGL, QAH, and Primer.  In SpecGL, I have not 
looked carefully at the Techniques or Examples

--lynne

At 07:58 AM 10/18/2004, Karl Dubost wrote:

>QAWG telecon participants --
>
>   If you won't attend the Monday (18 October) QAWG telcon, please reply
>(to list) with "regrets".
>
>   This is a regular teleconference, whose principal topic(s) will be:
>         Issues for SpecGL and TAG
>
>   Agenda
>   =====
>
>   Scribe: In the order
>         Last time   Scribe
>         2004-06-28      Dimitris Dimitriadis
>         2004-07-26      Andrew Thackrah
>         2004-08-16      Lofton Henderson
>         2004-08-23      Patrick Curran
>
>
>1.) roll call 11am EDT, membership
>
>2.) routine business
>         - Meeting in Reading
>
>3.) TAG/QA Coordination: Versioning
>         Lead: Karl
>         Dom, Dave an update?
>
>4.) QA Frame Spec GL
>         Lead: Karl
>         Editor's Draft version [1]
>         Issues List [2]
>         Worked on it at the beginning of the week. I have added the most
>important part of Lynne's Revision/Review.
>         Question: Lynne have you reviewed everything or are there parts to be
>reviewed still?
>         Question: New Numbering. Satisfied ?
>                 1.1 Technique A
>                 1.1 Good Practice B
>                 1.1 Good Practice C
>                 2.1 Technique A
>                 etc.
>         Question: Issue 1 [3]
>                 2.1 GP C Use examples or use cases to illustrate. [4]
>                 Someone against it?
>         Question: Issue 2 [5]
>                 1.2 GP C Example for ICS claims [6]
>                 Someone to give one.
>
>
>5.) SpecGL: developer/implementor
>         Lead: Karl
>         Which terms should we use in the specification?
>         Implementor is not "english".
>
>6.)
>
>
>7.) Adjourn
>
>8.) Overflow (12-12:30): available.
>
>   Logistics
>   =====
>   Zakim bridge: +1-617-761-6200
>   11:00am-12noon EST.
>   code: 7294 ("QAWG")
>   IRC, see: 
> <http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2001/12/07-QA-logistics#telcon>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2001/12/07-QA-logistics#telcon
>
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2004/10/WD-qaframe-spec/
>[2] 
><http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/09/qaspec-issues>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/09/qaspec-issues
>[3] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/09/qaspec-issues#no-001
>[4] 
><http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2004/10/WD-qaframe-spec/#use-example>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2004/10/WD-qaframe-spec/#use-example
>[5] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/09/qaspec-issues#no-002
>[6] 
><http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2004/10/WD-qaframe-spec/#ics-claim-ex>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2004/10/WD-qaframe-spec/#ics-claim-ex
>
>
>
>--
>Karl Dubost - <http://www.w3.org/People/karl/>http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
>W3C Conformance Manager
>*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 12:04:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:18 GMT