W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > November 2004

[closed] Re: Suggested wording for SpecGL 4.1 Principle B

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 16:06:50 -0500
Message-Id: <1A587E72-3681-11D9-AB55-000A95718F82@w3.org>
Cc: QAWG <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
To: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM>
Added to SpecGL
Le 28 oct. 2004, à 06:41, Patrick Curran a écrit :

> In the conformance clause, list the subdivisions that are mandatory 
> for conformance. To help build this list, consider the following 
> questions for each subdivision:
>
>    * Can an implementation conform without implementing the 
> subdivision?
>    * Does the subdivision apply to specific classes of products and 
> not to others?
>    * Is the subdivision dependent other subdivisions (that is, if it 
> is implemented must others also be implemented)?
>

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***


Received on Monday, 15 November 2004 00:58:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:18 GMT