Hi Karl, Thanks for doing this update. One omission might become an issue soon: testable, testability, etc. We are in the process of trying to close BH's five issues, one of which was "define testable". Our intended resolution is: "okay". IMO we can't close this (CR) issue until we implement the resolution. There is an extensive www-qa dialog that pretty much reached consensus closure, and there is a testability Wiki page. That should provide ample material for a useful definition. Cheers, -Lofton. At 10:58 AM 5/5/2004 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote: >Dear WG Members, > >After coordinating with Mark Skall, we have come with the new version >(2004-05-05) of the QA Glossary. > > http://www.w3.org/QA/glossary > >PS: I have added ids to definitions so it's easier to point them. > > >-- >Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ >W3C Conformance Manager >*** Be Strict To Be Cool *** > >Received on Friday, 14 May 2004 12:24:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:15 GMT