W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Outline for TestGL-Lite

From: Andrew Thackrah <andrew@opengroup.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:31:05 +0000
Message-ID: <4059B2A9.5020709@opengroup.org>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

Lofton Henderson wrote:
> Comment embedded....
> At 12:37 PM 3/12/04 +0000, Andrew Thackrah wrote:
>> Here's a thought about Principle #4
>> If the TS is being used to make conformance claims then the impact on 
>> conformance of making any change to the TS must be considered.
>> This implies:
>>     * The meaning/value of a conformance claim may change as the test 
>> suite evolves.
>>       o Instructions on making conformance claims should address this
> That's a good point.
> In SpecLite, "how to make a Conformance Claim" is one of the dozen+ 
> items that survived.  Since our new approach is to clearly and 
> completely develop each of a much-reduced number of topics -- with 
> explanation, examples, markup, tools, templates, etc -- would this cover 
> your point?  Or are you suggesting that something about this belongs in 
> TestTL also or instead?

It's the issue the links test suites to conformance claims so I think 
that it should be addressed in both places. An example might be the best
way to get this across - I'll have a think...

Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 09:31:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:32 UTC