W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2004

Re: "SpecLite" proposal

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:48:24 -0700
Message-Id: <>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 05:09 PM 3/10/04 -0500, Karl Dubost wrote:

>Le 08 mars 2004, à 19:13, Lynne Rosenthal a écrit :
>>Good.  I think extracting DoV and maybe CoP into a Tech Note would help 
>>provide exposure to these ideas.  The more people who are familiar with 
>>these concepts, the less difficult it will be to use them in the future.
>Agreed with Lynne. If the concepts are becoming too high level "cut and 
>paste" in a technical Note which will be a kind of Abstract level of QA 
>which will be used by people interested in the Topic inside or outside W3C.

Yes.  To be clear that we're on the same page:

** I'm fine with putting the abstractions elsewhere, i.e., the modelling 
concept of "DoV", and the modelling concept of "CoP".

** but "what must conform and how" is a critical thing for Specs to 
address; and "ways in which this spec will allow conforming implementations 
to differ" is a critical thing for Specs to address.  These are the 
concrete and common realizations of the abstractions.

Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 19:44:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:32 UTC