W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > January 2004

Re: Draft Minutes of QA Telcon of 05-January-2004

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 15:31:30 -0700
Message-Id: <>
To: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org


Excellent minutes.  A couple of minor clarifications (embedded)...

At 02:33 PM 1/5/04 -0500, Mark Skall wrote:
>The following link is Sandro's discretion of ontology test results:

That should be "description", not "discretion".

>LH  Test cases do not constitute a conforming test suite for OWL and 
>interoperability is in terms of test cases. Aren't there holes (no test 
>cases for normative content in OWL)?

Change "conforming" to "conformance".

(Interestingly, this is potentially more significant than a simple 
typo.  Because of the normative Rec-track "OWL Test Cases" specification, 
which contains some rules for "test case types", etc, one could argue that 
OWL defines the notion of conforming test cases and conforming test 
suites.  But in the above quote I do mean "conformance".)

Received on Monday, 5 January 2004 17:29:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:32 UTC