W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > February 2004

Re: f2f draft agenda posted

From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:11:20 +0200
Cc: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
To: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM>
Message-Id: <5320C09E-68A0-11D8-AE95-000393556882@ontologicon.com>

I second that, in addition want to stress the importance of bringing 
issues in sync with Spec and Ops (there's lots on terminology and 
sorting out issues that are inherently process and should therefore be 
in Ops, and issues that belong to a grey zone between the two). In 
addition, we want to have a clear picture of our issues since many of 
them have been posed by more than one person from different 
perspectives.

Looking at the agenda draft (paste below), what about allowing for an 
extra hour and a half during the afternoon (from QAF CR major 
issues/wrapup etc)? Wrapup and future meetings is typically quite fast. 
In that case, that extra time would need to be minuted by someone else 
except for me since I'll take active part in the discussion.

Tuesday AM -- 0830 - 1200 -- QAWG topics
      Scribe: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux
      Morning break: 1015
       test questionnaire, results
     	 Mary Brady presentation,
	 test deliverables review/status,
	 overview of TestGL issues list (**),
           issue status update
	 TestGL/ET status and outlook.

Lunch break: 1200 - 1300

Tuesday PM -- 1300 - 1700
      Scribe: Dimitris Dimitriadis
      Afternoon break: 1530
	 QAF CR major issues (continued from Monday),
	 wrapup, future meetings, etc.



On Thursday, Feb 26, 2004, at 22:55 Europe/Athens, Patrick Curran wrote:

>
> I'm disappointed at the small amount of time allocated for TestGL. 
> We're behind with this effort, but we do now have a public issues 
> list. As we've seen, it's difficult to get responses to issues by 
> email - scheduling time for group discussion seems to be the most 
> effective way to make progress. We don't get together very often, and 
> I really would like to push forward on this.
>
> Is there any chance of shuffling things so we could spend more time on 
> TestGL?
>
> Thanks...
>
> Lofton Henderson wrote:
>
>>
>> QAWG --
>>
>> The draft f2f agenda is at:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/QA/2004/02/f2f.html
>>
>> Suggestions, questions, discussion are welcome.
>>
>> It's linked from:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/QA/Agenda/
>> http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/#agendas
>>
>> -Lofton.
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 16:11:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:15 GMT