W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > February 2004

Re: Draft Minutes of QA Telcon of 23-February-2004

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:38:52 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040225131847.050d1080@localhost>
To: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

Good minutes.  A couple of small comments....

At 02:08 PM 2/23/04 -0500, Mark Skall wrote:
>[...]
>3.) Confirm WCAG answers
>
>LH  We should get a consensus reply to WCAG rather than my opinions.
>LH and DH

s/LH/LR/

>agree with replies.  No dissenting opinion.  Will tell Olivier that these 
>are consensus answers.

[...snip...]

>LH  Will characterize major issues.  Got some positive feedback from some 
>groups like WAI, but got a lot of indifference or hostility.  Most of 
>feedback is coming from Web Ontology and Jeremy Carroll.  Web Ontology is 
>trying to apply OPS Guidelines to their work.

s/trying/tried/

and add "That effort was the source of a lot of the comments that they sent 
to us."

Thanks,
-Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2004 15:35:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:15 GMT