W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > December 2004

Re: evaluation of CSS2.1 CR against QASpecGL - my assignment

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:17:43 -0500
Message-Id: <89C0D6A5-5456-11D9-A5B6-000A95718F82@w3.org>
To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org' <www-qa-wg@w3.org>

> 3.1 Requirement B: Create conformance labels for each part of the 
> conformance model
>  - NOT SURE IF THIS IS "YES" - if the conformance model is defined as 
> monolithic (just CSS2.1 specification itself), then it may be assumed 
> that there is only one label by default ("conformance"), although this 
> is not explicitly stated. However, as mentioned in Section 3.2, there 
> are three different conformance requirements given for three different 
> "classes of products", so if these represent three different parts of 
> the conformance model for CSS2.1, then they do not have conformance 
> labels defined in the CSS2.1 specification.  See previous discussion 
> also.

I would say "no" because you say it. Even if only one conformance label 
it has be explicit, and its not for now.

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2004 23:48:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:34 UTC