W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > December 2004

Fwd: Re: QAWG SpecGL review by WCAG WG?

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:19:02 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20041220141805.00ab3770@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: karl@w3.org
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

I sent this to the wrong list (should have been www-qa-wg@w3.org).. sorry

>Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:53:10 -0500
>To: www-qa@w3.org
>From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
>Subject: Fwd: Re: QAWG SpecGL review by WCAG WG?
>Cc: frederick.boland@nist.gov
>
>fyi, Tim Boland NIST
>
>PS I've also requested from CSSWG chair (cc'd to CSSWG list) for an agenda 
>item
>on the Jan 11 CSS WG telecon for SpecGL review (no telecons during
>holiday period)..
>
>>X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
>>Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:26:36 -0500
>>From: Wendy Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
>>Reply-To: wendy@w3.org
>>Organization: W3C
>>User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
>>X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
>>To: boland@nist.gov
>>Cc: michaelc@watchfire.com, Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>,
>>    Jenae Andershonis <jenaea@microsoft.com>,
>>    Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>, Matt May <mcmay@w3.org>
>>Subject: Re: QAWG SpecGL review by WCAG WG?
>>X-MailScanner:
>>X-MailScanner-From: wendy@w3.org
>>
>>Hello Tim,
>>
>>Thank you for tracking this item. Per an action item from the WAI 
>>Coordination Group, Jenae is reviewing SpecGL for the WCAG WG (with 
>>respect to WCAG 2.0 as well as accessibility issues in general). She and 
>>I plan to discuss her review either the first or second week of January 
>>(or sooner, since she is making good progress) and if we find issues for 
>>discussion with the larger group will suggest discussion on either 
>>Wednesday and/or Thursday telecons.   Also, depending on the issues we 
>>may need to coordinate our feedback with the PFWG. Another option that 
>>has been discussed is for WCAG WG  to directly send the feedback to the QAWG.
>>Are you planning to review the SpecGL for the PFWG and/or the AUWG? Have 
>>you already reviewed it with accessibility in mind?  If so, then perhaps 
>>you, Jenae, and I can talk the 1st or 2nd week of January and determine 
>>next steps.
>>
>>I'm ccing those folks who are related to this issue to ensure that we 
>>coordinate appropriately.
>>
>>Best,
>>--wendy
>>
>>boland@nist.gov wrote:
>>
>>>I would like to place QAWG SpecGL review on the agendas of either (or both)
>>>the first WCAG WG Wednesday-Thursday telecons of the new year, since WG 
>>>comments are due back to QAWG by the end of January 2005.  What is the 
>>>best way to do this?
>>>Thanks and best wishes,
>>>Tim Boland NIST
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>wendy a chisholm
>>world wide web consortium
>>web accessibility initiative
>>http://www.w3.org/WAI/
>>/--
>>
Received on Monday, 20 December 2004 19:19:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:19 GMT