W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > August 2004

Re: [SpecGL Draft] B3 list of normative and non-normative references

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:59:37 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040820065550.026cebd8@localhost>
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 10:29 AM 8/20/2004 +0200, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
>Le jeu 19/08/2004 ŗ 21:50, Lynne Rosenthal a ťcrit :
> > Looking at this, I propose that we delete it.  It states the obvious.  It
> > presents something that everyone already does.
> >
> > FYI -Currently it says:
> > Make a list of normative and non-normative references
> > GP: start now and keep adding to it as you go.
>
>I think BjŲrn raised an important question about normative references
>that would be worth adding to SpecGL:

Actually, as I recall, that thread raised a number of meaty topics.  IMO 
there is definitely some significant material here, if we want to deal with it.

-Lofton.

>when making a normative reference,
>you need to see how future versions of the said specification may affect
>your own document, and also possibly address the way you "use" the
>conformance model of the referred specification; see also our discussion
>during July 26 teleconf:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Aug/0066.html
>
>I agree that the current GP is not much useful, though.
>
>Dom
>--
>Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
>W3C/ERCIM
>mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Friday, 20 August 2004 12:59:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:18 GMT