Just some quick thoughts as to titles: Drilling down into Specification topics Topics about Specification complexity De-mystifying the complexities Food for thought: Variability in Specifications Knee Deep into the complexities of writing a specification --lynne At 10:40 AM 8/17/2004, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: >Hi Lynne, Dave, QA WG, > >I've started the work to make a proper WD from our concepts section of >the CR version of SpecGL [1]. > >While I intend to mostly put the content of the section as is in this >new WD, I need help on the following points: >- the title ; for now, I have "QA Specification Guidelines Advanced >Topics", but it's not very sexy ; any better idea welcome >- the abstract ; here is what I have now: >"This document details and deepens some of the most important >conformance-related concepts evoked in the QA Specification Guidelines, >developing some of the analysis axis that needs to be considered while >designing a specification." > >Corrections/suggestions welcome, > >Dom > >1. http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-qaframe-spec-20031110/concepts#concepts >-- >Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ >W3C/ERCIM >mailto:dom@w3.org >Received on Tuesday, 17 August 2004 20:04:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:17 GMT