W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > August 2004

Re: [SpecGL Draft] A.1 Principle: Include a conformance clause

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 14:23:11 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040804090832.01d9eec0@localhost>
To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 07:18 PM 8/3/2004 -0400, Lynne Rosenthal wrote:
>[...]
>>Technique
>>         1. Simple, complete the conformance clause template and put the 
>> result into the specification.
>>
>>         """KD: Do we have a conformance template?"""

Yes, SpecLite FPWD [1] has links to [2].  And [2] comes from proposals that 
I originally submitted to QAWG in March, and before that in January.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/
[2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/05/SpecLite-template.html


>Lofton is working on something as part of the NIST deliverable.  He should 
>have something soon.

[2] was derived from old SpecHeavy (from its GLs and CPs).  It's content 
needs revision to coordinate it with SpecLite -- most of the concepts still 
survive, but need to be rearranged and revised somewhat (and linked).  Also 
it will be available in an easier-to-use form.

Given the unstable state of the SpecLite text, and the energetic push to 
publish (in August?), Lynne and I have agreed that I should do the 
coordination work after the next WD publication.  The next WD should (like 
FPWD) refer to placeholder versions.

-Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2004 16:26:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:17 GMT