Le ven 23/04/2004 à 01:04, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > >Hmm... I'm unsure... It may better to leave it empty for now, waiting > >for the topic to be cleared out - there have subsequent discussions > >which make me wonder if the results of the meeting in June is still > >relevant. Sorry not to have better references yet... > > I am opposed to leaving it empty completely. After a lot of effort, we > achieved and published some results. Those have not been superseded yet by > anything visible to the membership (including our audience, the Chairs). I > think "no advice" is worse than some generic advice, like "Software License > or Document License, or piecewise application of same to different TS > components." My fear comes from the fact that in these matters, bad advice is worse than no advice... As I said, the issues are pretty complex, and it's hard to get a firm answer as soon as you deal with legalese. From what I can see, as of today, the preferred license for publishing a test suite is the Document license ; the topics of contributions, copyright holding, patent infringements would be good to cover as well. I'll try to coordinate with the person in charge tomorrow... Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.orgReceived on Monday, 26 April 2004 06:18:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:15 GMT