Le mar 13/04/2004 à 18:07, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > >4. Conformance > >Do we really need this section. I suggest removing it. It adds nothing > >and may set a bad precedent. Since this is a Handbook, we don't violate > >our own rule of having a conformance section in every specification. > > I was debating this. On the one hand, we say "Every W3C TR should have a > Conformance section". Are we vulnerable to criticism if the QAH does > not? Given the type of document QAH is, I think we'd better get rid of the conformance section ; of course, it doesn't hurt if we say why in the introduction (but keep it short). Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.orgReceived on Tuesday, 13 April 2004 12:29:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:15 GMT