Re: QALites and relevant W3C documents

>
>I think SpecLite should mention what Pubrules does and point to it -- i.e. 
>"Pubrules gives @@spec naming rules@@ for subsequent specification 
>versions depending on the relative conformance characteristics of the two 
>versions".  Otherwise (SpecLite could say), the conformance relationship 
>of subsequent versions is out of scope for SpecLite, except in the case 
>that a later version deprecates features of an earlier version.
>
>This could, for example, be handled in the scope/out-of-scope section (or 
>elsewhere, if it fits better elsewhere).

Good idea.