Both dates work for me... Lofton Henderson wrote: > > QAWG -- > > We have had some wrinkles about f2f attendance in June. We chose > 8/9/10 June. It now turns out that 15/16/17 June might be better than > 8/9/10 for optimizing attendance. And it would be available if we > informed Patrick *soon*. > > At least, it looks better based on the survey we did a couple weeks > ago. But maybe your constraints have changed (other commitments, > unchangeable air tickets, etc). So please reply.... > > QUESTION. Could you make: > > ** 15/16/17 June: Y/N/uncertain ? > ** 8/9/10 June: Y/N/uncertain ? > > Thanks in advance for you quick attention. > > -Lofton. > >Received on Thursday, 1 April 2004 18:49:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:15 GMT