W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: QAWG response to OpsGL comments

From: Leonid Arbouzov <Leonid.Arbouzov@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 18:05:09 -0700
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org, w3c-xml-schema-wg@w3.org
Message-id: <3F57E145.CB61811@Sun.COM>

Dear Lofton,

On behalf of the XML Schema WG I'd like to inform the QAWG that 
the XML Schema WG is happy and fully satisfied with the disposition of our comments. 
Thank you and the group for all your efforts and taking all of our comments into account

Regards,
Leonid Arbouzov


> Subject: QAWG response to OpsGL comments
> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 17:16:58 -0600
> From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
> To: Leonid.Arbouzov@Sun.COM
> CC: www-qa-wg@w3.org
> 
> Dear Leonid,
> 
> The QA Working Group (QAWG) thanks you for your comments on the Last Call
> Working Draft of "QA Framework:  Operational Guidelines" (OpsGL).  In the
> "Disposition of Comments" (DoC) document [1], you will find QAWG's response
> to your comments.  Please note that [1] is for Operational Guidelines only.
> We will generate separate tables for the Specification Guidelines and
> Introduction specifications.
> 
> In the descriptive information before the table in [1], you will find a
> complete description of the contents of the DoC table.  One particular is
> worth noting.  The table extensively references an Editor's draft of OpsGL
> [2], to illustrate the resolution of issues.  This draft is stable in
> substance, although there is still some minor formatting work in progress
> (especially finishing the application of markup and styling to the
> guidelines and checkpoints.)
> 
> The deadline for replies to this DoC document is 12pm (noon) EDT, Monday,
> 18 August 2003. Your reply at your earliest convenience  whether you
> accept QAWG's disposition of your comment(s) or not  will help us to stay
> on schedule for progression of Operational Guidelines. If we do not hear
> from you (originator) by the deadline, your default reply is "accept QAWG's
> disposition of comments".
> 
> If you do not accept QAWG's disposition of your comments, please provide
> details, including your reasons, and also what change to the disposition
> would be required to satisfy you.
> 
> Please copy the QAWG list on your reply (www-qa-wg@w3.org -- the Cc: of
> this message).
> 
> Regards,
> Lofton Henderson
> (QAWG co-chair, for the QAWG).
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/08/OpsGL-DoC
> [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/08/qaframe-ops-20030804
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2003 21:05:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:14 GMT