- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 14:59:33 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QAWG -- If you care about QAF-Introduction and disposition of its last call comments, please have a quick look at these documents. **Except for one** ... I have drafted issue resolutions for all Last Call issues. See the rough Intro Disposition of Comments (DoC) [3]. I called it "rough" because the intial boiler-plate text needs to be replaced (it's for OpsGL). The One Exception: I don't know what to say about LC-112.4 [2]. It asks, "Can you recommend a process by which the [WG's] QA people are NOT the people who work on the deliverable?" (and goes on with considerably more explanation and detail). I'd be happy to have some suggestions, how to answer. E.g., "no". Or, is this a topic for OpsGL? for OpsET? for SpecGL? for SpecET? (For "Intro", which is where we have it classified.) The new "Working Group Note" version of Intro [1] is very substantially revised. Basically, Susan Lesch provided complete alternate text with her LC-68 issue. It simplifies and consolidates the existing stuff. After careful review, I liked it much better and adopted it wholesale. I then applied any other Intro LC issues that still applied, and wrote all of the dispositions. -Lofton. [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/09/qaframe-intro-20030901.html [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/lc-issues.html#x112 [3] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/09/Intro-DoC.html
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 16:59:30 UTC