W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > November 2003

Re: Ops/Spec Reviews Organization

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: 26 Nov 2003 16:20:22 +0100
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1069860029.3977.23482.camel@stratustier>
Le jeu 13/11/2003 ŗ 04:18, Karl Dubost a ťcrit :
> Any persons of the WG who has progress contacts, etc, Send a mail to 
> the WG or qa-chairs asking for updating the information and it will 
> help all of us to track the information.

I plan to work with the Multimodal Interaction (MMI) WG; I've sent a
quick review of one of their document, loosely based on SpecGL:

(I haven't seen a reply yet, but then, it was on Monday :)
I'll try to have a look at their charters and test material development
plan, but haven't done so yet, so not much to report. I also want to
work on their other drafts.
(I think MMI is a good candidate, because:
- they are still pretty early in most of their specs
- they have lots of participants
- one of the Team contacts has shown some interest in a cooperation with

>        So I can fill the table of reviews [1]
> Dominique Hazael-M	:	QA		QA Ops GL/Spec

Does that mean I should check our own compliance with the framework?
(note that it might be a good idea, but that won't help us progressing
wrt CR).

> 						CSS?	CSS?
Might be a good idea, although a pretty hard one (due to the age of the
WG, its current status of specs, etc.). I'll see when I have a clearer
picture wrt MMI.

> [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/2003/09/qa-ops-reviews

Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/

Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2003 10:30:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:31 UTC