At 10:54 AM 6/24/03 +0900, Olivier Thereaux wrote: >[...]It doesn't change much, but it "sounds" better to publish the >summary for june on july 1st, even though it's really the summary for 25 >may - 25 june. > >Thoughts? Good idea. IMO, no one will care about the slight offset from month-start boundaries (probably no one will even notice!). -Lofton.Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 11:24:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:14 GMT