W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > June 2003

Fwd: www-math@w3.org

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:22:48 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030620152542.01e450e0@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

QAWG --

This is a p.s. to MathML's reply, for which I sent the main part a few days 
ago.  The main part is at:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Jun/0040.html


-Lofton.


>Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:57:23 -0500
>From: Robert Miner <RobertM@dessci.com>
>To: lofton@rockynet.com
>Subject: www-math@w3.org
>X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com>
>
>
>Hi.
>
>Oops.  I just saw
>
> > The spec. uses the term 'conformance' whereas the linked guidelines
> > document uses the term 'compliance' even though the content of the
> > guidelines document is essentially the same as the spec. If there are
> > to be separate documents covering conformance/compliance it is
> > recommended they use a single term. QAWG prefers 'conformance'
>
>We had changed the "conformance" to "compliance", but I will now
>switch them all back to conformance.
>
>--Robert
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>Dr. Robert Miner                                RobertM@dessci.com
>MathML 2.0 Specification Co-editor                    651-223-2883
>Design Science, Inc.   "How Science Communicates"   www.dessci.com
>------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 18:21:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:14 GMT