W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Re: Proposed text for SpecGL LC comments

From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:18:38 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030731131651.01c3ff48@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

Yes - it is because you keep telling me that I have to post these to the 
group.  And, I did forget to give a date.  Since most of these were 
editorial (and were trivial) - and were left to the editors and the more 
complicated ones were already vetted, I say 2 weeks at most - so close by 
Aug 11.



to At 11:45 AM 7/31/2003, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>At 11:30 AM 7/29/03 -0400, Lynne Rosenthal wrote:
>>QA WG
>>
>>A current working version of SpecGL is available at: 
>>http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/07/qaframe-spec.html
>>We are still working on the document, but as you can see much has been 
>>done and is still being done.  [...]
>>
>>Below are many of the LC issue resolutions and the text that has been 
>>incorporated.  Any comments?
>
>I'm assuming that this is being done as the final "Resolved-to-Closed" 
>step of these SpecGL issues?  I.e., QAWG has a period to review the 
>proposed closures (draft SpecGL text), after which they are marked 
>"Closed" (per draft text) if there are no comments.
>
>When is the deadline for comments?
>
>Given that there were approximately 40 issues listed in the message, I 
>suggest *at least* two weeks -- that's a lot of issues and text to look at 
>and think about.  (Three might be better.)
>
>Anyway, can you (SpecGL editors) suggest a deadline for comments, please?
>
>-Lofton.
>
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2003 13:18:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:14 GMT