W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Fwd: Re: Virtual or real CR?

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 17:13:29 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030727171040.035fb6a0@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

This dialog ties into Monday telecon discussion, about how to get to "CR" 
for OpsGL...

>From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
>To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
>Cc: qa-chairs@w3.org
>Subject: Re: Virtual or real CR? [was Re: QA Activity and Charters]
>Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 02:30:49 +0200
>Sender: Daniel.Dardailler@sophia.inria.fr
>X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com>
>
>
>a real CR would leave open the REC door, but since I thought we
>decided to close it, I did't see a strong value in it.
>
>maybe a better incentive for WGs when we're going to ask them to
>apply them (not comply, just apply) ?
>
>I'm open to both options.
>
>
> > Perhaps I have misunderstood what we decided at Crete.  Looking at 
> Daniel's
> > draft Activity statement, something caught my attention.
> >
> > At 10:57 AM 7/18/2003 +0200, Daniel Dardailler wrote:
> > >[..]
> > > > >I have drafted 3 documents:
> > > > >  - activity statement renewal
> > > > >     http://www.w3.org/QA/Activity-200307.html
> >
> > Here is a quote:
> >
> > >The QA WG has decided to suspend its work on the Ops and Specs guidelines
> > >and freeze them in their last call (with feedback from last call 
> included)
> > >release and to enter a virtual CR phase of 6 months during which those 
> two
> > >guidelines will be put in trial mode in the W3C WGs.
> >
> > I had thought that we would modify the Last Call versions per issues
> > resolution, and then try to take the real steps to CR, including the
> > necessary transition steps (including a Director's conference call).
> >
> > We should sort out fairly quickly about this.  Right now (Monday telecon),
> > I'm trying to sort out the details about some steps so that OpsGL will
> > start a real CR period before I go away for September.
> >
> > Virtual CR or real CR?
> >
> > -Lofton.
> >
> >
Received on Sunday, 27 July 2003 19:12:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:14 GMT