W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > January 2003

CP9.6, "turn off extensions"

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:26:13 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030113102100.01f04c60@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

Regarding AR-026 about SpecGL checkpoint 9.6...

Maybe "Require that implementations provide interoperable alternatives to 
extensions" would be a better way to phrase the checkpoint.  It better 
encompasses a "turn off" mode, equivalent alternative content, etc.  (It 
could even subsume a "not applicable" clause:  if it can be convincingly 
documented that a given extension does not adversely impact 
interoperability, then....)

Thoughts?

-Lofton.
Received on Monday, 13 January 2003 12:24:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:12 GMT