W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > February 2003

A TTF project

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:31:11 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030215162650.032edec0@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

This is the sort of thing that I would expect to be in the scope of the 
TTF.  IMO, TTF should actually start doing stuff like this now.

Is anyone interested to do this?  Following QAWG process, you would draft 
comments and show them to the QAWG (or in a time crunch, to the qa-chairs), 
before they were forwarded with the QAWG blessing.

Volunteer(s)?

Cheers,
-Lofton.

p.s.  We *do* have one of "he Outreach Five visiting VBWG at Boston.

>X-Authentication-Warning: sophia.inria.fr: Host accueil.w3.org 
>[193.51.208.132] claimed to be nimbustier
>To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, karl@w3.org
>Cc: scott.mcglashan@pipebeach.com, Jim Larson <jim@larson-tech.com>,
>         Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>Subject: QA review for Voice Browser WG
>From: Max Froumentin <mf@w3.org>
>Organization: W3C
>Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:29:07 +0100
>User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2
>X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com>
>
>[CC Scott, Jim: co-chairs of VBWG, Dave Raggett, co-team contact]
>
>Hi QA folks,
>
>I don't know the right address for this so I'm addressing you
>directly.  The Voice Browser working group has a spec called Speech
>Synthesis Markup Language which is going to go to CR soon and thus the
>WG is starting work on a test suite. The work on the test suite framework
>is already well advanced, and I thought you might take a look at it:
>
>The latest documents are at:
>
>[working document aimed at describing an analysis approach, to define a 
>possible taxonomy of tests for SSML]
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-voice-wg/2003Feb/att-0033/01-SSML_-_Methodological_Contribution.htm
>
>[Latest teleconference minutes about spec assertions]
>http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.1.6.0.20030211133650.03932fe8@mailhost.speechworks.com
>Would you like to have a look at them and provide feedback? Or perhaps
>you would like some face-to-face time at the technical plenary to
>present the QA activity?
>
>In the meantime, I will direct the WG to the QA documents.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Max.
Received on Saturday, 15 February 2003 18:31:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:12 GMT