Re: Suggested schedule for Boston Outreach

Le mer 05/02/2003 à 08:02, Olivier Thereaux a écrit :
> On Wednesday, Feb 5, 2003, at 07:10 Asia/Tokyo, Patrick Curran wrote:
> > Whether or not we agree on this schedule, I think it's obvious that we 
> > need to decide pretty quickly on what our key messages are. Please 
> > respond to me with a *very brief* (three to five short 'bullet 
> > points') outline of what you think we should be saying during our 
> > Boston pitches.
> 
> I'm looking forward to seeing the other's points, but my apprach today 
> would be:
> 
> * you can't afford to ignore QA
> * analyse what conformance to your spec(s) means
> * turn this into tests
> * Do it. Now. Don't wait for LC, or CR, or whatever
> * we can help [pointers...]

Mine would be pretty similar:
* cost/benefits of QA
* integrate QA in your WG (OpsGl)
* integrate QA in your spec (specGL)
* coordinate with us, exchange your QA experiences with others

Dom
-- 
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org