W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > February 2003

review assignments

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 11:23:13 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030204110946.039fcb70@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

QAWG,

Your opinions please...

Ref:  http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2002/06/reviews

These people still have open review assignments:

Dimitris, Karl, Peter,
Kirill, Dom, Lofton,
Lynne, Andrew, Olivier (optional),
(, Patrick?)

Note that we already changed the due dates to accommodate the issuance of 
the Last Call text (2003-02-10).  I.e., you will use the LC versions to do 
your WG and/or spec reviews.  But the dates are only changed to 2002-02-15.

It is my thought that we should change the due dates to 2002-02-24.  That's 
2 weeks after Last Call, and 1+ week before Boston (and 3 days before our 
final pre-Boston telecon.)

Reason.  These reviews have done a good job of flushing out problems in 
OpsGL and SpecGL.  Two weeks is more reasonable than 5 days.  And finishing 
the reviews before Boston would perhaps give us the start of an issues list 
before we meet in Boston (in case we have any time available for 
OpsGL/SpecGL issues or planning at Boston).

Thoughts?

-Lofton.
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 13:20:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:12 GMT