W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > December 2003

Re: QA Matrix, RDF entries

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:54:39 +0000
Message-ID: <3FE07C3F.8000709@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org, Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org



Dominique Haza√ęl-Massieux wrote:

> Le mer 17/12/2003 09:08, Jeremy Carroll a rit :
> 
>>Looking at the QA matrix
>>http://www.w3.org/QA/TheMatrix.html
>>
>>I note the following aspects concerning the RDF PR documents
>>1) RDF Schema does not have conformance clauses
>>
> 
> The QA Matrix doesn't claim that it does. Or did I misunderstand what
> you meant? 
> 


Sorry I was misreading the validator link ...
the link seems to be broken, and as far as I am aware VRP has not been 
updated to conform to the latest RDF Schema PR. (i.e. afaik it still harks 
back to the old CR from 2000).


> 
>>2) The test suite covers aspects of RDF Syntax, RDF Semantics, RDF Schema and 
>>RDF Concepts (although it is not a conformance test suite for any of these)
>>
> 
> OK, I've added Test Suites entries for these various specs.
> 
> 
>>3) there is an RDF validator hosted at www.w3.org/RDF/Validator that checks 
>>syntax against RDF Syntax, and also some constraints from the abstract 
>>syntax, in RDF Concepts
>>
> 
> The RDF Validator is now bound to both of these specs.
> 
> 
>>PS for OWL there is more than one validator, none of which are hosted at the 
>>W3C - typically they validate the syntax only
>>
> 
> Could you send us the URLs of these services, so that we can link to
> them from the matrix?


Looking at
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/impls#Implementations

I would suggest
http://phoebus.cs.man.ac.uk:9999/OWL/Validator

as a good online service.

> 
> Thanks for the updates,
> 
> Dom
> 

Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2003 10:55:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:15 GMT