- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:54:39 +0000
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org, Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: > Le mer 17/12/2003 09:08, Jeremy Carroll a rit : > >>Looking at the QA matrix >>http://www.w3.org/QA/TheMatrix.html >> >>I note the following aspects concerning the RDF PR documents >>1) RDF Schema does not have conformance clauses >> > > The QA Matrix doesn't claim that it does. Or did I misunderstand what > you meant? > Sorry I was misreading the validator link ... the link seems to be broken, and as far as I am aware VRP has not been updated to conform to the latest RDF Schema PR. (i.e. afaik it still harks back to the old CR from 2000). > >>2) The test suite covers aspects of RDF Syntax, RDF Semantics, RDF Schema and >>RDF Concepts (although it is not a conformance test suite for any of these) >> > > OK, I've added Test Suites entries for these various specs. > > >>3) there is an RDF validator hosted at www.w3.org/RDF/Validator that checks >>syntax against RDF Syntax, and also some constraints from the abstract >>syntax, in RDF Concepts >> > > The RDF Validator is now bound to both of these specs. > > >>PS for OWL there is more than one validator, none of which are hosted at the >>W3C - typically they validate the syntax only >> > > Could you send us the URLs of these services, so that we can link to > them from the matrix? Looking at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/impls#Implementations I would suggest http://phoebus.cs.man.ac.uk:9999/OWL/Validator as a good online service. > > Thanks for the updates, > > Dom > Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2003 10:55:01 UTC