W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > August 2003

SpecGL observation from talking to XQuery

From: <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 09:42:38 -0400
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF5401B82B.33AA1653-ON85256D78.004A2591@lotus.com>

I will not be able to attend the telecon today. I thought I should
pass along one item from my discussion last week with the XQuery
editors. We talked about more than just the Functions & Operators spec
that I reviewed, because that review was supposed to be a signal of
the spec concerns that will aply to more of their specs.

An implementation of an XQuery processor will be allowed to vary by
being either a static analyzer or dynamic. We discussed how to
characterize the difference. At first it seemed like a profile, since
the variance can be described as whether the user gets errors
reported early (static) or late (dynamic). As the discussion
progressed, we started thinking of it as a matter of levels. Every
query that works in a static processor will also work in a dynamic
one, but the reverse is not the case.

For now, they will think about the variance as a two-level case. With
the collapsing of the module/profile/level guidelines into one, their
initial discomfort (the variance didn't seem like any of those) may
be smoothed over. I don't think QAWG is required to take action, just
note the discomfort in case that verbiage is adjusted again.
.................David Marston
Received on Monday, 4 August 2003 09:44:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:31 UTC