W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: discussion of LC comments on Extensions

From: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:59:52 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030428105649.01e61948@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>, www-qa-wg@w3.org


>>
>>The new Concept chapter will have a DoV caution and we agreed(?) that 
>>each DoV would have a simple caution statement.
>
>I have made an alternate proposal, which has been linked from the issue 
>list for some time:
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Apr/0026.html
>
>I disagree that we should "tone it down" -- extensibility is #1 on my 
>interoperability list of evils.


Extensibility does not equal DOV.  DOV has to do with variability.  Every 
technique for variability does not "extend" the standard.  Subsetting, for 
example, does not extend.  rather it organizes things differently

****************************************************************
Mark Skall
Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division
Information Technology Laboratory
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970

Voice: 301-975-3262
Fax:   301-590-9174
Email: skall@nist.gov
****************************************************************
Received on Monday, 28 April 2003 11:00:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:13 GMT