Substantive reply later, but one quick editorial comment/question... At 05:15 PM 4/22/03 -0400, david_marston@us.ibm.com wrote: >[...] >Saying in the definition that "Modules are non-hierarchical..." seems >like an unnecessary constraint. Modules are typically not hierarchical, Didn't we deal with this as an editorial issue (in a LC comment), that we really meant what David just said. I.e., hierarchy is not a defining criterion of modules, but particular modularizations may exhibit hierarchy. -Lofton.Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 18:18:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:13 GMT