Re: profiles/modules/levels -- 2 of 2

• From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
• Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:20:50 -0600
• To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030422161558.0498caf0@terminal.rockynet.com>

Substantive reply later, but one quick editorial comment/question...

At 05:15 PM 4/22/03 -0400, david_marston@us.ibm.com wrote:
>[...]
>Saying in the definition that "Modules are non-hierarchical..." seems
>like an unnecessary constraint. Modules are typically not hierarchical,

Didn't we deal with this as an editorial issue (in a LC comment), that we 
really meant what David just said.  I.e., hierarchy is not a defining 
criterion of modules, but particular modularizations may exhibit hierarchy.

-Lofton.

Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 18:18:51 UTC