W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Profile/level (was Draft Minutes of 14-April-2003 Teleconference -- 2nd)

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: 18 Apr 2003 09:57:53 +0200
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Cc: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1050652675.6105.141.camel@stratustier>
Le ven 18/04/2003 ŗ 02:16, Lofton Henderson a ťcrit :
> At 09:46 AM 4/16/03 -0400, Mark Skall wrote:
> >[...]
> >DH: Profiles and levels are the same thing.
> >
> >LH: Disagree.  They are different but profiles can be levels.
> Oops, if that's what I said, then I mis-spoke.  It is backwards.  Should 
> be:  "Levels can be profiles.  Every levelled specification could be 
> written as profiles, but the converse is not true."

FWIW, that's what I meant also by saying they are the same thing -
namely, I don't think there is any benefit from distinguishing levels
from profiles, since levels can easily be seen as profiles, and the only
CP in the levels GL is one which is already present in the profiles GL.

Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/

Received on Friday, 18 April 2003 03:58:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:30 UTC