W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: LC Issue 109 Processing for Thursday

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 17:07:28 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030408170511.034782a0@terminal.rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

It is published now:

http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/lc-issues#x109

Btw, in case "usage scenarios" don't go away (i.e., 1.3 survives or usage 
scenarios are rolled into 1.2 or ...), an editorial question:  why are some 
occurrences of "Usage Scenarios" capitalized?

-Lofton.

At 02:28 PM 4/7/03 -0400, Lynne Rosenthal wrote:

>Hello All
>
>For Thursday, Please be prepared to discuss Issue 109 - Should we delete 
>CP 1.3 and if no, what is the rationale for keeping it.  (this issue may 
>not be published yet).  This will be the first topic of discussion on 
>Thrusday, 10 Apr.
>
>Discussion:  It is unclear as to the difference between CP 1.2 and CP 
>1.3.  Is CP 1.3 a superset of CP1.2? Do we need both?
>
>thanks
>Lynne
>
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2003 19:05:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:13 GMT