W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: AI-2002-0904-4 and AI-2002-0904-3 Done

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:02:45 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020926155548.03215e80@rockynet.com>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

(CAVEAT:  SpecGL reviewers, see below).


Karl,

Again thanks.

All -- one thing I just noticed.  For SpecGL reviewers, we forgot to update 
the skeleton (on 'reviews' page, see below) after we published SpecGL on 
8/26.  I'll do this before the end of the day.  If you haven't started your 
SpecGL review, please get new skeleton when it is available.

Also, about the 'tbd' on all of the column 4 dates... we (Karl & I) think 
that we should talk about this at Tokyo (or maybe the 2-oct telecon) and 
set the dates.  For OpsGL, I'm thinking about a due date of something like 
1-nov or 7-nov.

-Lofton.

At 05:03 PM 9/26/02 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote:

>AI-2002-0904-4   Chairs (Karl)   propose dates for columns 1 and 2 (QA Ops 
>GL and QA Spec GL) of the Assignment Matrix for the QA Framework Reviews. 
>Half of the dates should be before November and half after.
>
>AI-2002-0904-3   Chairs (Karl)   make assignments for the techniques 
>assessment for a GL document
>
>These two actions items have been done.
>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2002/06/reviews
>
>
>IMPORTANT
>----------
>Mark and Olivier look at your assignment.
>
>--
>Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
>           http://www.w3.org/QA/
>
>      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
>
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 18:01:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:10 GMT