W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > September 2002

QAWG Issues priority

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 16:16:56 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020903153847.03e9c390@rockynet.com>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org


QAWG,

Here are some issues listed as "Active" in the 2002-09-03 Issues List 
[1].  Note that I have added new #79 (I wanted to ensure that this outside 
comment on TestGL does not get lost), and I corrected the erroneous 
"closed" status of #64.

#60: QA responsibilities of existing WGs [Ops]
#39: choice of MUST/SHOULD/MAY [Ops]
#64: choice of MUST/SHOULD/MAY [Spec]

#49: W3C standard license for test materials [Ops]
#50: liability from 3rd-party TM usage [Ops]
#59: W3C standard license for submitted test materials [Ops]
#32: Guidelines/checkpoints for branding [Ops]

#73: require atomicity of modules [Spec]
#74: scope of the minimality of level 1 [Spec]
#75: relationship of modules and levels [Spec]
#76: levels and profiles [Spec]
#77: different requirements for legacy specifications [Spec]
#78: checkpoint against implementation dependent features [Spec]
#69: Discourage flavors of conformance [Spec]
#61: Require standard terminology? [Spec]
#15: Address/define valid conformance claims? [Spec]
#51: Deprecated features [Spec]
#63: all checkpoint priorities in Spec Guidelines [Spec]
#13: Inter-standard and multi-standard conformance [Spec?]

#68:  Status of Extech parts [all-framework]
#23: Tests for SHOULD/MAY [Test]
#79: TestGL and "how to" guidelines  [Test]
#43: Relationship of "Certification Note" and Framework [Ops]
#14: How to do E&O [Process?]
#35: Resource supplement to other WGs [Ops]

Regards,
-Lofton.

[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 18:16:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:10 GMT