W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > October 2002

SpecGL problems/issues to be addressed

From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:32:28 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021031112902.01c6ee88@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
The following is a list of the SpecGL @@@ questions/comments.  I've 
indicated those that we addressed at the last telcon, and those that are 
still open.


Updated SpecGL problems/issues

** indicates priority.
* indicates we can deal with this quickly

The following were addressed during telcon, 28 Oct.

G 1:  explanation and clean-up of sentence on use cases 
(editorial)  Drafting assignment: Andrew/Lynne  due prior to 4 Nov
1.3:   make the statement stronger.  Currently requires only 1 
example  Agree, this should be made stronger
3.1  TOC for profiles  drafting assignment: Lynne  may not be done prior to 
6 Nov publication  try to develop 1 checkpoint
3.5  what is meant by 'testable rule' 'clash'  testable rule = testable 
requirement. Replace clash with contradict
6.2 and 6.3 rationale for CP on strict conformance  Drafting assignment: 
David, lofton/lynne to review.  Revisit explanation and clarify, review all 
checkpoints.
**12.1, 12.2 normative ICS  discussed at prior telcon

The following still need to be addressed

*2.2:  move discussion on class of product to ET
*2.2    reword CP or its TA
3.3     do we need a rationale or write a better one
7.2     reword CP or its TA - suggested CP reword: Define support 
requirements for deprecated features"
7.3     applicability of CP to class of product
G9 rewritten, general consensus
9.6  applicability, remove?
13.1 add words on capitalization
13.3 testability of consistent terminology
**14.1 TA discussion on normativity
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 11:38:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:11 GMT