W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Never Mind. Re: Due dates for Techniques Analyses

From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:29:33 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021022112917.01f42a50@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org

Great.  Thanks. That is what I will do.

Lynne

At 11:22 AM 10/22/2002, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>Lynne,
>
>According to an email exchange between you and me on 7/31, you agreed to 
>do UAAG.  (On 9/15, we had another, because UAAG 4th LC [2] was closing soon.)
>
>For various reasons (blah...blah...) this never got entered into the 
>matrix.  It's there now.  [1] is the PR text of UAAG, which is probably 
>the best one to review (4th LC is moot now).
>
>-Lofton.
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG10
>[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-UAAG10-20020821/
>
>
>At 09:06 AM 10/22/02 -0400, Lynne Rosenthal wrote:
>>Never mind, I see that Olivier is taking care of WCAG.  I'll do what ever 
>>you assigned me - so XLink it will be.
>>
>>grumble, grumble
>>Lynne
>>
>>
>>At 07:25 AM 10/22/2002, Lynne Rosenthal wrote:
>>
>>>I don't know how many times to email this, but I have asked that I not 
>>>be assigned to XLink and to do one of the WAI Guidelines - e.g., WCAG 
>>>instead.  Can you please make the change in the Matrix.
>>>
>>>thank you
>>>Lynne
>>>
>>>
>>>At 01:37 PM 10/21/2002, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>>>
>>>>QAWG --
>>>>
>>>>Please have a look at:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2002/06/reviews
>>>>
>>>>We have picked due dates for the Techniques Analysis assignments 
>>>>(column 4) for SpecGL and OpsGL: 16-December-2002.  This date is chosen 
>>>>with the goal that the Extech editors can integrate the results and 
>>>>have a strong ET draft for input to January face-to-face.
>>>>
>>>>Note.  Some people now have assignments due on both 12/15 and 
>>>>12/16.  Given that the due dates are about 8 weeks hence, and given 
>>>>that SpecGL and OpsGL will both be available by 6 November (about 6 
>>>>weeks in advance) ... it would make sense to get the review assignments 
>>>>(column 1/2) out of the way earlier rather than later.
>>>>
>>>>I thought I heard Karl say something about a reward for early 
>>>>completion (any SpecGL assignments) -- 1 beer or other beverage of 
>>>>choice for each week that you're early!  (Did I get it right, Karl?)
>>>>
>>>>-Lofton.
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2002 11:36:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:11 GMT