W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Never Mind. Re: Due dates for Techniques Analyses

From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:06:01 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021022090404.01ddef70@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org

Never mind, I see that Olivier is taking care of WCAG.  I'll do what ever 
you assigned me - so XLink it will be.

grumble, grumble
Lynne


At 07:25 AM 10/22/2002, Lynne Rosenthal wrote:

>I don't know how many times to email this, but I have asked that I not be 
>assigned to XLink and to do one of the WAI Guidelines - e.g., WCAG 
>instead.  Can you please make the change in the Matrix.
>
>thank you
>Lynne
>
>
>At 01:37 PM 10/21/2002, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>
>>QAWG --
>>
>>Please have a look at:
>>
>>http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/2002/06/reviews
>>
>>We have picked due dates for the Techniques Analysis assignments (column 
>>4) for SpecGL and OpsGL: 16-December-2002.  This date is chosen with the 
>>goal that the Extech editors can integrate the results and have a strong 
>>ET draft for input to January face-to-face.
>>
>>Note.  Some people now have assignments due on both 12/15 and 
>>12/16.  Given that the due dates are about 8 weeks hence, and given that 
>>SpecGL and OpsGL will both be available by 6 November (about 6 weeks in 
>>advance) ... it would make sense to get the review assignments (column 
>>1/2) out of the way earlier rather than later.
>>
>>I thought I heard Karl say something about a reward for early completion 
>>(any SpecGL assignments) -- 1 beer or other beverage of choice for each 
>>week that you're early!  (Did I get it right, Karl?)
>>
>>-Lofton.
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2002 09:12:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:11 GMT