QAWG position on errata proposal

QAWG,

We need to have a look at a new errata proposal that is being discussed on 
the chairs list.  A particular aspect, for example, is that it defines 
published errata to be "non-normative".  This clearly has testability 
implications.

You could for example look at the message from Paul Gross, 19-sept, 15:50:27

(I can't get the link right now).

-Lofton.