- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 10:41:12 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020530103937.02895430@rockynet.com>
QA Working Group --
Here is a suggested issue processing order for telcon discussion. Please
speak up if you'd like to see a different order. Since we are meeting
face-to-face in two weeks, it is my thought to postpone till then issues
that are:
** more complex
** or, benefit from shared visual materials
** or, require more background preparation
The current (2002-05-29) Issues List is at [1].
The #nn numbers below refer to the Issue numbers in the summary list at
[5], which in turn are hyperlinked to the more detailed issue description.
For telcon
-----
#66 [Glossary]: dated versions?
#62 [Ops, Spec]: conformance labels
#61 [Spec]: standard terminology for classes of products
#60 [Ops]: "In the charter," in ckpt statements.
#69/70 [Spec]: flavors of conformance (see DM message at [4])
(clarify DM proposal, not necessarily resolve)
#63 [Spec]: confirm checkpoint priorities.
#64 [Spec]: use of keywords should/shall/must
#57 (') [Ops] : choice of MUST/SHOULD/MAY
(see [2] and references linked from [1])
For f2f?
-----
(These were on a prior telcon listing.)
#49 [P&O]: W3C standard license for TM
#50 [P&O]: liability from 3rd-party TM usage
#32 [P&O] Branding
#51 [Spec]: Deprecated features
#15 [Spec]: valid conformance claims.
#23 [TM]: Tests for SHOULD/MAY
Regards
Lofton
[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-qaframe-ops-20020515/
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-qaframe-spec-20020515/
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002May/0040.html
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 12:40:40 UTC