W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > May 2002

RE: 2nd draft Montreal agenda

From: Kirill Gavrylyuk <kirillg@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:03:33 -0700
Message-ID: <B3F0DACD72892E4DB7E8296C6C9FC2F60507506C@red-msg-03.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Hi, all!

Unfortunately I realized pretty late in the game that I need to renew my
visa to Canada. I had to switch my flight to 06/13 therefore (consulate
cannot give me the new visa earlier), so I will be only on the second
day.

 

Could we move the discussion of the following 3 topics to the second
day?

- Framework: status/plans for Ops parts
- Framework: status/plans for Test parts ( I'd like to present a short
outline/draft on the f2f, will try to post in advance)

- "Test license" issue (KG)

 

Please take my apologies for the inconvenience it may cause.

 

Thanks

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:56 AM
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Subject: 2nd draft Montreal agenda

 

QAWG participants --

Here is a 2nd draft of proposed Montreal agenda.  Please review and
either send any comments by email, or bring up then up in the Thursday
(5/30) telcon slot.

Notes (LH).  

1.  On day 1, do we want to have earlier room access, e.g., 8am, so that
we don't spend half the morning fiddling with network connectivity?

2.  Topic order is chosen with a view to possible dial-in from Europe.

3.  Topic list and topic order are "proposed" -- please comment.  New
topics?  Different order?

4.  Times are (probably) unrealistic in this draft.

-Lofton.


DAY 1 - June 13, 2002
-----------------------------

08:45 Welcome, Roll Call, WG Membership topic(s)

09:00  Telcon schedule issue

9:15-11:15 Outreach & education topics
        - A week in QA: Status
        - How-to have more participation of the IG? (list of people?
etc?) Does the QA IG should work closely with other organisation like
WASP (http://webstandards.org/)
        - How to get more participation in the WG?
        - W3C Project Review
        - Chairs meeting presentation
        - proactive charter/ops review? (per WD OpsGuide) 
        - proactive spec review? (per WD SpecGuide)
        - A-2002-03-01-4 from [1]:  requiring/enforcing Guidelines

10:00-10:15 Break

11:15-12:15 Outreach & education topics
        - Proposal for a "Test WG"
        - Horizontal activities: WAI, I18N, DI, QA
        - Tools Maintenance and resources (HTML validator, CSS
validator, EARL report, ...)
        - Relation with the TAG

12:15-13:30 Lunch

* "QA Glossary" topics and issues

* Long-term Framework goals/schedule proposal
        - 06/2002 Montreal f2f
        - 08/2002 WG posting all Frm parts 
        - 10/2002 f2f Asia/Pacific (Tokyo)
        - 10/2002 TR publish all Frm parts (FPWD at least)
        - 01/2003 f2f North America or Europe
        - 01/2003 "Last Call", all Framework parts
        - 03/2003 Tech Plenary, present "finished" Frm.

* Framework priorities, issues, status, staffing
        - Priority order: [Ops parts;] Spec parts; Test parts
        - Extech parts issues
        - status/plans for Ops parts
        - status/plans for Spec parts
        - status/plans for Test parts

* Framework document formats 
        - change for Guide-Extech maintenance
        - XHTML with a few new 'class' attributes
        - then xmlspec
        - Extech issue solution?

* 15:00-15:15 Break

* 15:15-17:00 Issues Processing 
        - "Test license" issue (KG)
        - From Issues List [2]

DAY 2 - June 13, 2002
-----------------------------
08:45 Roll Call

* 09:00-10:00 Issues Processing [2]

* 10:00-10:15 Break

* 10:15-12:15 Issues Processing [2]

* 12:15-13:30 Lunch

* 13:30-15:00 Issues Processing [2]

* 15:00-15:15 Break

* 15:15-16:30 Issues processing [2]

* 16:30-17:00 Logistics, Next F2F.

References:

[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/ActionItems
[2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/qawg-issues-html
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 16:04:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:09 GMT