Peter. Good minutes, thanks. I have just a few editorial nits (along with the "previous minutes" pointer that I sent earlier), and one question at the end... At 05:06 PM 5/23/02 -0700, you wrote: >[...] >Lofton has posted first draft minutes for f2f. Karl has posted first draft agenda for f2f. >Scheduling for f2f in Tokyo, 10/7-10/8. Sept is too busy, earlier has >typhoon issues. Change "earlier" to "and". >[...] >A good start has been made on Spec Guide but on start yet on SpecExtech or >Test Documents. "on" -> "no" >[...] >6) Brief summery: >In process of publishing, it has come up that we need to enhance our doc >format. use xhtml with classes for checklists and guidelines and other >document pieces. Then we use stylesheets to layout them out. "layout" -> "lay" >[...]One last note for f2f. There was a request for feedback from w3c on how >willing member companies would be to follow what we come up with. Could we >get a report from the w3c on any feedback on that. I can't remember what this refers to, and who brought it up. Can someone suggest a clarification for the "final" minutes? Oh yeah, and one last thing. Let's document this action item so that it doesn't get lost: A-2002-05-23-3 Karl/Lofton to flesh out a more complete draft Montreal agenda by 5/30. -Lofton.Received on Sunday, 26 May 2002 16:15:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:09 GMT