Re: please report on AI status

At 12:37 PM 3/12/02 +0900, Olivier Thereaux wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 11, 2002, Mark Skall wrote:
> > The glossary is an ongoing effort.  I think it should be classified as 
> such.
>
>Mark, I think we shouldn't mix projects (glossary, or framework) with
>action items.

Why don't we call the AI "done" when there is a first WG draft available 
for review, discussion, and addition of new terms?

-Lofton.

Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 09:24:50 UTC