W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Spec Guidelines

From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 15:53:10 +0100
Message-Id: <200203011453.g21ErAN00878@zidane.inria.fr>
To: spec-prod@w3.org
cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

I don't think it's a good idea to have both
as a subset of

This duplication will lead to confusion.

I think we should only carry forward the second one, the Manual of
Style, using a checkpoint layout with priorities 1, 2, 3 (much like
the WAI guidelines), and assign P1 to pubrules checkpoints, with a
policy enforcing level A.

We also need to understand how the QA Spec guidelines (no PD yet, but
talking about conformance assertion, testability of specs, etc)
is going to integrate and interface with these/this documents.
Received on Friday, 1 March 2002 09:53:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:26 UTC