W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > June 2002

Re: Proposed outline of the evolution of the QA Framework

From: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: 16 Jun 2002 23:25:51 -0400
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1024284351.4950.14.camel@cirrustier>

Le dim 16/06/2002 ŗ 11:16, Lofton Henderson a ťcrit :
> I do have a question on some details.  You write, "we push a document in WD 
> in Last Call when we feel it's stable enough for review by the other 
> working groups."  It is (was?) our target to reach last call on all parts 
> in 1/2003.  So Last Call period would happen just before Tech Plenary, and 
> we would enter CR "implementation" phase after Tech Plenary.
> Given that we can't really expect serious attention to documents before 
> Last Call (usual W3C practice), how would you suggest to try to get some WG 
> input in the interim? 

The upcoming Technical Review is a good occasion to seek input: if you
ask explicit feedback during the presentation, you might convince some
of the team contacts to have a closer look at the documents. Otherwise,
"Last Call" documents are really done to gather feedback. If necessary,
we can have 2 or even 3 Last Call before going to CR.

Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
Received on Sunday, 16 June 2002 23:32:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:27 UTC