W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > June 2002

Fwd: RE: chairs meetings

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:19:07 -0600
Message-Id: <>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org

QAWG -- this qa-chairs message is forwarded, for the WG archive and for 
reference at the Montreal f2f...

>X-Sender: kdubost@madcow.inria.fr
>Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:42:20 +0900
>To: qa-chairs@w3.org
>From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
>Subject: RE: chairs meetings
>X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com>
>At 19:40 -0600 2002-04-11, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>>At 07:49 PM 4/11/02 -0400, you wrote:
>>>I haven't thought this through, but what I am  pondering, is whether what we
>>>touched on during the telcon regarding I18N, etc, a topic that is of
>>>interest to other WGs or is this something that is mostly of interest to us.
>>>And thus, we pursue it with each of the horizontal groups (WAI, I18N, etc).
>>Yes, this is exactly what I'm wondering.  I'd like Karl and Daniel 
>I think all horizontal WGs are often bored to repeat and repeat exactly 
>the same things for the Spec (as the QA WGs will be after a certain time). 
>So I think we should review our specifications and point out the 
>accessibility, I18N, etc issues, solve them if we think we can do it, and 
>if we can't ask to the respective WGs a solution or an answer.
>1. WAI, I18N, DI, etc for our own documents and recommendations.
>2. A mutual guide for Quality (as large) in Working Groups.  There's a 
>need of a common way to write a charter for a WG and how to address 
>different things.
>         I think to a modular charter template:
>         - QA Module
>         - WAI Module
>         - I18N Module
>         etc.
>I think the guide for Member should make a chapter on that 
>Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
>           http://www.w3.org/QA/
>      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2002 12:17:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:27 UTC