W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > July 2002

Re: Notes on SpecGL discussions [DRAFT]

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 10:47:18 -0600
Message-Id: <>
To: David Marston/Cambridge/IBM <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 11:19 AM 7/25/02 -0400, David Marston/Cambridge/IBM wrote:
>I propose that checkpoint 5.4 be dropped, and the explanatory verbiage
>be moved over to 10.1, which currently has no such verbiage. Of course,
>the second sentence, a mere cross-reference from Ck 5.4 to GL 10, should
>be dropped. Once that's done, GL 5 will focus on the establishment of a
>policy, while GL 10 will focus on the documentation of it.

An interesting twist came to mind as I was implementing this.  It will be 
tricky to verify the GL5 checkpoints, or even talk about verification, 
without mentioning documentation.  I suppose that we can take the attitude 
in GL5 of "somewhere and somehow", and supply specifics in GL10 ("in the 
conformance clause").

Received on Monday, 29 July 2002 12:44:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:14:28 UTC