Re: action items

At 10:28 AM 7/11/02 +0300, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote:
>>[...]
>[dd] Olivier, do you monitor the QA WG list for closed action items? If 
>so, you could alsways remove them for brevity. If it implies a bigger 
>workload on your behalf, we should stay close to process as Lofton indicates.

Yes, it is probably best to *not* assume that Olivier will notice a "this 
completes A-...", when embedded in a longer message.  Especially since he 
has a very full plate, let's send him a simple message to clear 
items.   (Copy the WG or not, at your discretion -- if the item is likely 
to interest other people, then I suggest to copy the WG.)

>>[...]
>>You have posted draft minutes, and it has been more than a week since the 
>>meeting.  By now, final should have been posted to the WG, and you should 
>>have sent the IG a message with a pointer to the archive (or web page in 
>>the case of f2f).  See:
>[dd] Just did, one day late.

Thanks for this.  One day late is not a big deal.  A few days late, a week 
or more late -- that starts to be a problem.

-Lofton.