W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Issue priority for FPWD

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:23:36 -0500
Message-Id: <p05101002b85a516b117e@[24.200.104.88]>
To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 09:21 -0700 2002-04-03, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>#26.  Even if it is very brief, we *must* have a Conformance Clause 
>(we're QA, right?!)

Some people thinks that the formal language of IETF is enough. I 
don't think so. Because the Conformance clause explain how to be 
conformant relatively to a client, a server, etc... it helps to 
define Level of Conformance and of implementation.

So yes it's critical... but... we should find good arguments to 
convince people.
:)


-- 
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
           http://www.w3.org/QA/

      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 13:26:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:13:08 GMT