Re: Issue priority for FPWD

At 09:21 -0700 2002-04-03, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>#26.  Even if it is very brief, we *must* have a Conformance Clause 
>(we're QA, right?!)

Some people thinks that the formal language of IETF is enough. I 
don't think so. Because the Conformance clause explain how to be 
conformant relatively to a client, a server, etc... it helps to 
define Level of Conformance and of implementation.

So yes it's critical... but... we should find good arguments to 
convince people.
:)


-- 
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
           http://www.w3.org/QA/

      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---

Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 13:26:39 UTC